Explanatory journalism with depth and rigorPTENES

Betting Provisional Measure: Lawmakers Introduce Over 90 Amendments

Lawmakers seek to ease the ban and protect sports contracts

Daniele Morais
October 14, 2026 · 2 min read
ShareWhatsAppXFacebook
Betting Provisional Measure: Lawmakers Introduce Over 90 Amendments
Photo: "Art Rooney, Man of Steeler-Town" by Tony Fischer Photography is licensed under CC BY 2.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/.

The end of the deadline to submit amendments to the provisional measure banning betting sparked intense debate in Congress, especially as discussions unfold in the heat of the electoral campaign.

Why the issue has gained prominence now

The provisional measure, signed by President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, is valid for four months and requires a vote within 120 days. The deadline for suggestions, postponed until after the first round of elections, coincided with the need for political parties to introduce proposals that could influence voters.

Key changes proposed by lawmakers

Among the nearly 100 amendments submitted, several call for exempting sports betting from the ban, refunding part of the fees paid for licenses, and establishing a transition period so that clubs can maintain advertising contracts.

Impact on football clubs and sports finances

Deputies and senators with ties to football argue that a total ban would threaten revenue streams funding youth academies, women's football, and Olympic sports. Some amendments suggest a transition period of up to 24 months for terminating sponsorships, as well as limiting betting to consolidated results to reduce the risk of match-fixing.

Procedures for refunding funds to bettors

With the shutdown of betting platforms on October 6, banks and payment institutions have until October 14 to return approximately 1.325 billion reais to 26.5 million users, according to a government survey. If difficulties arise, Caixa Econômica Federal will intervene starting October 15.

Legal developments and legislative outlook

Three lawsuits before the Federal Supreme Court are challenging the provisional measure, involving the National Confederation of Commerce and betting industry associations. While the Office of the Attorney General of the Union defends upholding the ban, experts note that any potential compensation will depend on demonstrating concrete damage and a causal link.

With information from O GLOBO, VEJA, Estadão.

Source: O GLOBO, VEJA, Estadão

#betting provisional measure#parliament#sports betting#club contracts#legislation
Also inPortuguêsEspañol

Understand the topic

In-depth reporting from Explosão Solar that explains the subject of this story.

ShareWhatsAppXFacebook